Creating high-quality software doesn’t just depend on how good your code looks. It’s also about how well your team works together to improve, test, and refine the code before it goes live. This is where code reviews come in.
A code review is a process where another developer checks your code to make sure it’s correct, clean, secure, and easy to understand. It helps catch bugs early, improves team communication, and ensures that everyone follows the same standards.
In this blog, we’ll walk you through six essential steps for a strong and efficient code review process. Each step is explained in the easiest way possible, while still giving you all the important and accurate information based on the latest industry best practices.
This template helps you fix both with a clear action plan.
The smaller the change, the better the review. When you keep your code changes short and focused on one thing, reviewers can understand it quickly and give better feedback. Most experienced developers agree that 200–400 lines of code per review is ideal.
Instead of sending large chunks of code that touch many parts of the app, try breaking them down into separate, logical pull requests (PRs). For example, if you’re fixing a bug and also improving some UI styling, submit those as two separate reviews.
If every reviewer looks for different things, your review process will be slow and inconsistent. That’s why it’s important to create a clear checklist or guide that tells everyone what to look for.
Set expectations for how fast reviews should be done (e.g., within 24–48 hours), and who should review what kinds of code (e.g., front-end, back-end, APIs, etc.).
Clear guidelines make reviews fair, fast, and helpful for everyone.
Code reviews don’t always need to start with humans. Today, many helpful tools can automatically check your code for simple issues like formatting, security holes, or unnecessary complexity. These are called static analysis tools and linters.
These tools make the whole review process smoother and more professional. Learn how to choose the right tech stack for your custom software project to ensure long-term code quality and review efficiency.
When giving feedback, focus on improving the code, not criticizing the coder. Your words should be clear, kind, and helpful. Think of it as coaching, not judging.
Also, it helps to ask questions instead of making demands. For example:
“Could we consider making this loop a map function for better readability?”
By keeping reviews respectful and solution-focused, you build trust and make your team stronger.
The best code review process is one where everyone feels safe to ask questions, give feedback, and learn. Teams that create a culture of kindness and openness usually perform better and learn faster.
Creating a positive review culture helps team members improve their skills, feel respected, and stay motivated.
Remember, the goal of a code review is not just to approve or reject code—it’s to share knowledge and help each other grow.
Even a good process can always get better. That’s why strong teams regularly check how their code reviews are going and look for ways to improve.
Always be ready to listen to feedback, learn from mistakes, and make the review process better over time.
A strong code review process isn’t just about finding bugs. It’s about:
By following these six simple but powerful steps:
...you can make your code better, your team stronger, and your development process smoother.
When done right, code reviews become a superpower - one that lifts your entire engineering team to a higher level of excellence.
Want to dive deeper into writing better code? Check out our blog on Effective Python Programming: Tips for Writing Clean, Maintainable Code to learn actionable ways to keep your codebase strong and healthy.
...Loading
We have got the answers to your questions.
Join us to stay connected with the global trends and technologies
